Must you buy a pension annuity
Friday, June 27th, 2008A fact about your annuity: Did you realise that annuities are probably one of the least popular and most misunderstood aspects of retirement among ordinary investors.
There is a small minority that don’t like annuities. If you die in the short-term, you get a bad deal. That is bad news, but that money cross-subsidises others. It is a strong system for supplying people with a guaranteed income.
For those set against annuities, income drawdown allows individuals to keep full investment control over their pension assets. Under drawdown, also known as unsecured pension, an individual can take an annual income between zero and 120% of a limit set by the Government Actuary’s Department, which is roughly comparable to the market annuity rate, from their pension fund.
If an individual using drawdown dies before the age of 75, their pension benefits can be passed as a lump sum to their beneficiaries, less a 35% tax charge. Alternatively, their dependents can continue with drawdown or purchase an annuity.
Until 2006, anyone in drawdown had to purchase an annuity by the age of 75. Now, though, individuals over 75 can take an alternatively secured pension (ASP). Under ASP, the income limits are tighter than with drawdown and an overall tax charge of 82% applies to any remaining assets on death, making it a very unattractive as a way of passing on assets.
Some pension providers offer a facility called scheme pensions to individuals over 75. With scheme pensions, an actuary calculates the income that can be taken, taking into account an individual’s health, with the aim of exhausting the pension fund over the individual’s estimated remaining life.
This gives a higher income than ASP, particularly if life expectancy if poor. Similar tax charges to those under ASP will apply to any remaining assets on death.
For anyone considering drawdown and its post-75 variants as an alternative to annuity purchase, the risks involved should be fully understood. Many people see the choice at retirement as being a simple one between traditional lifetime annuities and income drawdown, but there are other options.
As well as conventional annuities, retirees could consider a temporary annuity for periods of five years upwards to a maximum of the time taken to reach age 75. Living Time chief executive Kim Lerche-Thomsen said that fixed term annuities allow retirees to ‘test-drive’ their retirement rather than making an irrevocable decision at a relatively early age.
Other alternatives to conventional annuities include investment-linked annuities and the so-called ‘third way’ annuity products. With investment-linked annuities, the annuity fund is investing in unit-linked assets or a with-profits fund. This means that there is an element of investment risk associated with the annuity. Prudential business development director Aston Goodey said there has been a resurgence of interest in with-profit annuities and noted, ‘They are a natural stepping stone from lifetime annuities and are middle to low risk.’
Third way annuity products, or variable annuities, from providers such as the Hartford, Met Life, Lincoln, and Aegon, seek to offer guarantees and more flexibility than a conventional annuity.
For the many retirees with small pension pots, a conventional annuity may be the most sensible choice. For others, a combination of conventional and investment-linked annuities could give the foundation of a stable income with the chance of a rising income if the investment element does well.
For those determined not to annuitise, there is still income drawdown and its post-75 extensions. In this complex area, seeking good financial advice is wise.

